MPs have criticised the test being used to see whether people claiming disability benefits are fit to work.
The Public Accounts Committee said the Work Capability Assessment had resulted in too many wrong decisions which were overturned on appeal.
Its chair Margaret Hodge accused the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) of being "unduly complacent" and of hurting the "most vulnerable".
But employment minister Mark Hoban accused the MPs of "scaremongering".
The Work Capability Assessment tests was introduced in 2008 to assess entitlement to Employment and Support Allowance, after it was claimed the old system was failing.
The company Atos was paid £112.4m to carry out 738,000 assessments in 2011/12.
'Damaging confidence'
The committee found 38% of appeals against the DWP's decisions had been successful.
Ms Hodge, a Labour MP, accused the government of "poor decision-making", which was "damaging public confidence" in the system.
Although Atos has faced criticism, "most of the problems lie firmly within the Department for Work and Pensions", she said.
"The department's view that appeals against decisions are an inherent part of the process is unduly complacent," she said.
"The work capability assessment process hits the most vulnerable claimants hardest.
"The one-size-fits-all approach fails to account adequately for mental health conditions or those which are rare or fluctuating."
'Scaremongering'
Although the department had "started to improve", she said, claimants "too often" found the assessment process so stressful that their health deteriorated.
"A key problem is that the department has been unable to create a competitive market for medical assessment providers, leaving Atos in the position of being a near monopoly supplier," she said.
"The department is too often just accepting what Atos tells it. It seems reluctant to challenge the contractor. It has failed to withhold payment for poor performance and rarely checked that it is being correctly charged."
In 2010, the government commissioned Professor Malcolm Harrington to review fitness-to-work benefit assessments. He subsequently called for an overhaul of the system to make it more "fair and humane".
Mr Hoban said the committee's report "completely" failed to recognise this.
For Labour, shadow work and pensions secretary Liam Byrne said: "This damning report exposes the chaos and confusion at the heart of the Tory-led government."
He called for" fundamental change of the test before any more money is wasted and any more people are hurt".
Blog thought-
It is very clear from the select committees videos the issues that are being faced.
It is also clear that the policies are not being looked at in respect to the results.
Surely it is time that contractors were under more scrutiny
"Although Atos has faced criticism, "most of the problems lie firmly within the Department for Work and Pensions", she said."
ReplyDeleteI think this is a fair assessment.
One onus is that to explain the gap in employment, the GP may have to tell an employer is fit for work. The potential employee can now say he is capable (not disabled) for work. However, if the GP does not find the employee fit and ATOS does there is a conflict of opinion.
Head injuries (traumatic brain injury) must be difficult to assess.
The government must be responsible in ensuring that PWD's can receive their proper compensation. Since most of them don't have the capacity to earn for a living, they must be evaluated properly and fairly to receive the premiums that they need to survive. I know the government doesn't want to waste their funds on unqualified and false beneficiaries, so they have to be meticulous enough in screening applicants. On the other hand, PWD's can seek the help of professionals in social security law to assure themselves that they can receive the right compensation.
ReplyDeleteParmeleLawFirm.com